Saturday, May 2, 2015

Moot Court: Bakke v Regents of University of California


Mr. Bakke was a prospect for medical school at the University of California Davis who made the claim that race was a factor in him not being admitted into the University's Medical school program.
Regents of the University of California v Bakke was a case disputing whether the admissions process at the Medical School of the University of California was constitutional or not. The ruling declared that using racial quotas in it’s admissions process was unconstitutional but using Affirmative Action was. Bakke claimed that the school’s admission process violated the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment. It’s important to note that Bakke was also older than most of the other medical school applicants in his pool, which was a fact that caused a separate debate within this case (McBride 2006).

In the moot court case, the side defending Mr. Bakke had two main points. The first was that Mr. Bakke had a 3.1 GPA while only students who had below a 2.5 GPA would be excluded from considering being admitted. According to the University, anyone with a GPA above a 2.5 would be given an interview. The second argument was that Bakke was a veteran which means he deserved a shot at medical school considering the grades he had and the time he spent serving our country.

The team defending UC Davis made the case that the affirmative action program is meant to integrate all cultures into the medical school, not just African Americans. Also, it was pointed out that Bakke was in his mid thirties in a time at which med schools practiced age discrimination. Bakke was not economically disadvantaged, making him not eligible for a special admissions program offered for all prospective students.

Thursday, April 9, 2015

Spread the Words

        For this post I'd like to focus on an interesting book that I read recently, which I feel can be connected to a current event. Recently there was a 600-page rewrite of  'No Child Left Behind'. One of the parts of NCLB that I don't agree with is the lack of accountability on the government's part. There are few if any national standards when it comes to education, leading to many decisions being left up to state governments. What I'd like to point out is the section regarding English language learners. NCLB states that the federal government will give grants to states to further the education of the English language for infants, adults, and young immigrants. I believe that if America is going to hold the title of 'The World's Melting Pot' then that philosophy must be shown in our education system by encouraging immigrants to learn our language. 
       My argument is supported by a book I read recently called “Hunger of Memory”. Richard Rodriguez’s “Hunger of Memory” is a memoir of Rodriguez’s experiences in losing his culture and his language as a result of making an effort to assimilate himself into American society. In the beginning of the chapter, Rodriguez explains how he felt a sense of unity and belonging when he’d come home to a Spanish-speaking home after feeling alienated in the outside world. Rodriguez speaks on the language of the ‘Los Gringos’ and how he struggled to have every day conversations with people, including his shyness in school. Eventually, Rodriguez decided that in order to thrive in society, he needed to become better at speaking the English language. At this point, his shyness in school was resolved and he was finally connected with society. The downside was that Rodriguez struggled to communicate in Spanish to his friends, relatives, Spanish-speaking strangers and teachers. As a result, Rodriguez wrote “Hunger of Memory” to express the frustration of growing up as a Hispanic-American citizen and student.  He writes: “Without question, it would have pleased me to hear my teacher address me in Spanish when I entered the classroom. I would have felt much less afraid. I would have trusted them and responded with ease”.
        Rodriguez’s personal account of his struggle with education in America shows how if there was a gradual system for immigrants’ children into the education system, these kids would be better off in their academic careers. If an American travels to another country, there may or may not be a gradual integration system for Americans, but if we’re going to accept the title of the world’s ‘melting pot’ then we must differentiate ourselves in being willing to gradually integrate foreign children into our education system. If our nation’s education looked at Rodriguez’s experience then we can also make immigrants’ integration into our country a little more stress-free. I believe that Rodriguez’s book was not just about his experience in the school system, but his difficult experience as a human being in the United States. 

source: http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/inside-the-600-page-rewrite-of-no-child-left-behind/2015/04/08/bbec7616-de0b-11e4-a500-1c5bb1d8ff6a_story.html

I Have a Dream Thanks to Dr. King (Part 2)

The art of public speaking is something I admire and it opened up my journey towards becoming an avid reader and writer. I love free-lance writing, not having to worry about my poor use of the semi-colon, and use periods instead of commas to embrace a pause and impactful statement. These all derive from my style of public speaking that I have developed over the last six years. I love free-lance writing because I don’t use notes in my speeches. I do write an outline to study and prepare for my speeches; but I love to have a few quotes in the back of my head, know my purpose of giving the speech, have a few animated stories that I’m willing to share, and just go for it. I use a lot of periods in my personal journal instead of commas because it emphasizes the pauses that everyone is taught to make when they’re giving a speech. I use those pauses a lot, therefore I think that same way in my brain, leading to it translating onto a paper.

 My writing and reading style greatly derives from the way I give speeches, because public speaking was my first date with words, and I fell in love. Since the day I gave the MLK Day speech, I’ve had several presentations that I’ve given to churches, non-profits, and organizations that cater to the development of young children. In the near future I plan on starting a business venture that deals with giving seminars/presentations to other college students and young people. As mentioned earlier, the weekend of the Martin Luther King “I Have a Dream” speeches wasn’t the easiest one I’ve given, but it was definitely the most significant. In the near future, I also hope to write a book once I master the art of writing and live a little longer to have more experiences and stores to share.

I Have a Dream Thanks to Dr. King (Part 1)

        Not everyone loves to read and write, and not everyone can read and write. For noteworthy people in history such as Fredrick Douglas and Malcom X, their pursuit of proper grammar came from personal experiences. I’m standing before a congregation of two hundred and fifty people whom I am familiar with. A paper with every word that I’m supposed to say is right in front of me. What is there to be afraid of? Probably nothing, but firstly as a twelve year old I didn’t know if I was worthy of reading the words on the paper in front of me. Secondly, I didn’t know what I was doing because of my lack of experience. The speech: “I Have a Dream” by Martin Luther King Jr; not to mention, I had never given a speech in my life. At the time it was a scary experience, but it was the starting point of me realizing a dream of mine; to be a public speaker. “You have a very nice speaking voice” my mothers and other adults would say. The problem was, that’s all I had, ‘a nice speaking voice’. I had no other skills when it came to giving speeches. I had no interesting stories and experiences to share, and I didn’t know how to alter the pitch of my voice. To my disadvantage, I didn’t’ have nerves of steel and all I was good for was looking down and reading off of a piece of paper. Everyone has to start somewhere right?
On this day, I was nearly forced by the church’s ‘first lady’ and my mother to give this speech. Not only did I have to do it once on Sunday service, but on Friday and Saturday at different church events. Of course I didn’t write this speech, I had never written an essay, but it did feel like I owned this speech.
        Not only did I own the speech, but I owned the authority of being in front of an audience with a belief in what I was saying. I could relate to the content of what I was saying, it resonated in my heart, and I was sharing it with others. At the end of the day (a phrase I say too often when I speak), that’s what public speaking it. Someone once said that the great public speaker is the man who is not savvy with words but the man who is ‘drunken’ with a certain belief in what he says. I still don’t know who that ‘someone’ was or the exact quote, but I know that’s how I felt when I gave my first speech. I was hooked.
         Since then, I can’t even recall how many speeches I’ve given. The art of public speaking is something I admire and it opened up my journey towards becoming an avid reader and writer. I love free-lance writing, not having to worry about my poor use of the semi-colon, and use periods instead of commas to embrace a pause and impactful statement. These all derive from my style of public speaking that I have developed over the last six years. I love free-lance writing because I don’t use notes in my speeches. I do write an outline to study and prepare for my speeches; but I love to have a few quotes in the back of my head, know my purpose of giving the speech, have a few animated stories that I’m willing to share, and just go for it. I use a lot of periods in my personal journal instead of commas because it emphasizes the pauses that everyone is taught to make when they’re giving a speech. I use those pauses a lot, therefore I think that same way in my brain, leading to it translating onto a paper.

         My writing and reading style greatly derives from the way I give speeches, because public speaking was my first date with words, and I fell in love. Since the day I gave the MLK Day speech, I’ve had several presentations that I’ve given to churches, non-profits, and organizations that cater to the development of young children. In the near future I plan on starting a business venture that deals with giving seminars/presentations to other college students and young people. As mentioned earlier, the weekend of the Martin Luther King “I Have a Dream” speeches wasn’t the easiest one I’ve given, but it was definitely the most significant. In the near future, I also hope to write a book once I master the art of writing and live a little longer to have more experiences and stores to share.

Wednesday, April 8, 2015

Can Your View on Gay Marriage Change?


        “How My View on Gay Marriage Changed” is an article written by David Blankenhorn of the New York Times in which he explains why his personal beliefs in regards to gay marriage has changed. Out of the three sources used in this synthesis, I find this source the most interesting because of all of the culture wars occurring in 2015, gay marriage is the hardest issue to sway someone’s belief and opinion of. Blankenhorn explains how at first, his argument against gay marriage was the children and the rights they had in regards to having/knowing their biological mother and father. This, he points out, was due to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of a Child in 1990 (Blankenhorn). After a while, Blankenhorn realized that his argument was really rooted behind anti-gay prejudices that he had. He also explains the need of Americans to accommodate to the idea of gay marriage in society, as more people, especially younger ones, are more accepting of the idea of gay marriage. Blankenhorn assures that legally recognizing gay and lesbian couples is an act of simple fairness in our country. 
       
Blankenhorn admits to using the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, stating that children have the right to receive care under the parents, which brought him into the world, in order to defend his stance against gay marriage (Blankenhorn). Although this event occurred in 1990, legislation like this throughout history has both caused turmoil and been used as a scapegoat for chaos. This chaos comes in the form of mainly Christians and anti-homosexual unions protesting and causing social unrest. 
        Blankenhorn’s change on his view of gay marriage proves that a change in perspective can translate into a peace of mind and open-mindedness. Bruni’s personal account of being scolded in public due to his sexual orientation can give us a situation to put ourselves in vicariously, which could result in a change in opinion. Bruni also presents poll results that expose the thoughts and feelings of Americans who oppose gay marriage.